Executive summary
Board-readable risk posture, severity mix, and a remediation timeline. Written for a UK director, not a scanner operator.
Home / Services
Services
Manual-first VAPT for United Kingdom product companies and the agencies that ship for them. Web, mobile, cloud, API, network and desktop — with reports that survive Cyber Essentials Plus reviews, ISO 27001 audits and enterprise questionnaires.
Seven lines
02
03
04
05
06
07
On every engagement
Board-readable risk posture, severity mix, and a remediation timeline. Written for a UK director, not a scanner operator.
Per-finding CVSS v3.1, affected asset, reproducible steps, evidence, and a fix a developer can ship this sprint.
After you patch, we re-test every confirmed issue and issue a sign-off letter for customers and auditors.
On request: independent VAPT was performed, dates, scope summary. Useful for ISO 27001, CE+, SOC 2 questionnaires and UK GDPR records of processing.
Every engagement
Scanners run alongside the engagement to cover breadth. They never decide what counts as a finding. Everything in the report was reproduced by hand, because the vulnerabilities that matter — authorisation, tenancy, business logic — require someone who understands what your product is supposed to do.
Every engagement that involves authorisation runs with two accounts at the same privilege level, plus one per role. It is the only way to prove that user A cannot reach user B’s data rather than assume it. If you can only supply one account, we will tell you which findings become unprovable before you sign.
Testing a system without the owner’s permission is an offence under the Computer Misuse Act 1990. Every engagement starts with a signed authorisation letter naming the scope, the window and the people involved. We counter-sign it. No exceptions, and no packet before it exists.
We take enough evidence to make a finding undeniable and then we stop. A few rows, a screenshot, a replay script. We do not bulk-extract your customer data, encrypt anything, or leave persistence behind to demonstrate that we could have.
When you have patched, we verify every confirmed finding and issue a statement of what is closed. It is included, not a change request — because a test with no re-test does not prove anything was fixed, and that is the part your auditor cares about.
One page naming the scope, dates, tester and outcome. It is what enterprise procurement teams are usually asking for when they say they want to see your penetration test, and it lets you evidence the work without circulating your own vulnerability list.
Choosing
Start with the application that holds their data — usually web or API. That plus an attestation letter answers the great majority of UK enterprise due-diligence requests. Add network only if their questionnaire specifically asks about infrastructure.
Your auditor wants evidence of technical vulnerability management, not a specific test type. An application test with a documented re-test, mapped to Annex A, is the cleanest evidence. If your estate is mostly cloud-hosted, cloud covers ground CE+ and an application test both miss.
CE+ is an audited baseline, not an attacker simulation. It does not attempt to move through your network or test your own application’s logic. Internal network testing shows what happens after a phishing email lands; an application test shows what your own code allows.
If a previous supplier, a bug bounty programme or your own team produced findings that nobody can act on, security audit and reporting revalidates them, removes the false positives, re-scores against your context and rewrites the document for the people who have to read it.
If none of these describes you, book the call anyway. Thirty minutes usually settles it, and we would rather tell you that you need less than you thought than sell you a week you did not need.
Questions
A thirty-minute call. Assets, timeline, a quote in pounds sterling.
Request a quote